1. Key
argument: p. 63: “Interpreting Asian American culture
exclusively in terms of the master narratives of generational conflict and
filial relation essentializes Asian American culture, obscuring the
particularities and incommensurabilities of class, gender, and national diversities
among Asians.”
2. The
making of culture and “Chinese American Culture” p. 64-65
3. “Asian
America” p. 65 NB: Difference and Other than, in relation to
Difference and diverse among ousrselves.
4. Heterogeneity
p. 67
5. Hybridity
p. 67 NB: “Does not suggest assimilation to dominant
forms but instead marks the history of survival within relationships of unequal
power and domination.” P. 67 NB:
not a mathematics of “race”
6. Multiplicity: p. 67
7. “How
does do these (H, H, and M) concepts help us critically understand the material
conditions of Asians in the US?” p.
68. NB:
“not relying on the construction of sameness and the exclusion of difference!” Name another system that relies on that type
of framing (construction of sameness and exclusion of difference).
8. Really
flesh out and understand her “recasting of cultural politics” p. 70-73 NB p. 73 “against the divide and conquer,
otherizing, and fixed and stable binaries.”
9. Fanon! P. 72
10. The
failure of race or nation based explanations p. 74
11. Angela
Davis’ notion of a political formation p. 74
12. “Politicizing
this identity—basing the identity on the politics rather than the politics on
identity.” p. 74 and note no. 23
13. Cultural
Nationalism: p. 75 we will look at this
in week 5
14. Discourse
p. 75
15. Strategic
Essentialism p. 82
16. Stuart
Hall, “positioning” and “a politics of identity.” P. 83
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.