Last week’s talk about diaspora and
what it meant got me thinking on how can it be defined in one word or if it has
only more than one meaning. Based on the discussions in class we determined
that the term diaspora had multiple meanings since it is constantly changing
throughout the years. The definition that struck me the most was the definition
that Ien Ang defined for us in his essay Beyond ‘Asian Diaspora that “all
peoples must have a territorial specific homeland and that living away from it
is an unnatural and undesirable condition” and that these groups of people are
often associated with immigrants, refugees, and exiled communities. However, he
also states that these groups of people are dispersed from their homes and that
they are in the myth of returning home therefore making it difficult for them
to be accepted in the host country and culture since these people do not want
to leave their culture that they brought with them, but instead want to feel
more at home in their host country and culture without having to assimilate.
The idea of being forced to leave
one’s homeland gives me the impression that the term diaspora is put upon
people because I honestly believe that no one leaves their homeland
voluntarily. Yes people have a choice on whether to leave or stay in their
homeland but the reason that people leave their homeland is because they feel
the pressure of being forced to leave because they outweigh the costs and
reward on making a drastic decision on leaving a homeland that one holds dear. If
a person has to leave the country in order to find a better opportunity not
only for them but also for their children, then that decision is a forced
decision because they made the impression that staying at their homeland would
not benefit them other than being closer to their culture and homeland.
Not only does the decision of the
people to leave their homeland play a factor but also advertisement of the
hosting countries that advertise their prosperity and oppressing the success of
other countries. Many countries such as the United States advertise their prosperity
by inventing the “American Dream” and how only through hard work and patience
is one able to achieve their dream, but not just any dream, the American Dream.
Once those people that fell into that propaganda, they notice that the American
Dream was just a beautiful lie of a dream that would never become a reality
because of all the unequal opportunities offered for people that were not
citizens. Unequal opportunities for those people that did not let them be
comfortable and therefore have that wanting on returning home but either
external or internal issues are impeding that therefore it becomes a myth for
some that they will ever return back home. This type of propaganda and other
factors play a role in forcing people to leave their hometown and therefore are
known as diaspora according to Ang.
I entirely agree with you, Moises. I believe that this speak about Diasporas is very interesting. I too believe the reading "Asian Diasporas," was interesting in the sense that is was complex in an attempt to demonstrate how complex formulating a definition of Diaspora can be for an individual. It is currently working under a definition that there are various locations of residence, but these residences are only created when humans create borders and divides and attribute names, values, and perceptions to these spaces. Migration is natural and unnatural in many ways and I believe Ang was also is agreeing with your interpretation that migration is not a choice, but rather a push by systemic forces. These forces created the term diaspora to label people that do not "come from here." But what is here? And who does "Here" and "There" belong to?
ReplyDelete