Introduction To Ethnic Studies: Spring 2014
Friday, June 6, 2014
Thursday, June 5, 2014
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
Monday, June 2, 2014
Saturday, May 31, 2014
RP4: Reflections
Our discussions in class Thursday about
our personal research question made me realize something. As my group
members each attempted to identify their own obsessions and interests
in order to create their own question, I was busy questioning the
question. In order to know what my personal research question is, I
have to know myself. Who am I? I found the discussion difficult in
that there is a paradox that blocks us from receiving a simple
answer. We need to know ourselves to establish a question, but how
can we possibly know ourselves when we as individuals are constantly
changing? We are under a constant barrage of media and educational
topics, and the more we explore the more we expand ourselves. The
self is indefinite, so how can we, so early in our lives, be expected
to establish a question to pursue? It came to me that we can
establish a question as long as we do not expect to receive a
definite answer. Over time the question will change, as will the
answer. It will adjust to our changing selves. It, like us, will be
fluid.
Who am I? I feel like most of us in the
class were, in one way or another, asking ourselves the same
question. In the past few weeks, I have become so focused on Rabasa's
concept of Elsewheres, and that every individual person is different,
that I had forgotten that we as a collective humanity are still
capable of having commonalities. All of us at this point are still on
a mission of self-discovery. We are all learning more and more about
topics that interest us in hopes that we might better understand
ourselves. We share the common journey of self-discovery, searching
for a sense of personal enlightenment. What are we here for? What can
we do? It seems to me that we in this class are all searching for the
answers to these questions. And although it may be frustrating when
we cannot find a definite answer, it is only natural to work through
that stress and continue on.
I wanted to write this to remind
everyone in our class that even as we knock down social binaries,
break through borders of race and culture, and establish that every
individual is indeed an individual, that we are not alone. We are all
on this journey of self-discovery together, and I have been very
pleased to have shared my journey with you for the past 9 weeks. I
look forward to seeing what answers we do find, and how our questions
all change in the future. Thank you, and always remember you do not
journey alone.
RP4: Coloniality, Colonialism, and Mignolo
Colonialism saddens me, and in a large scheme Mignolo does not support the idea that coloniality is permanent; however, when applying his theory to our daily lives, I have a hard time understanding the ways in which colonialism can be entirely dismantled. I understand that there are methods which can be applied to anti-colonialism to render its effectiveness, but on a large scale I think that the demolition of colonialism is impossible.
Unfortunately, I am working from a limited perspective and I do not yet have the scope to conceive of the abolition of colonialism. Considering the ways in which the land of The People has been historically* misused, it will be difficult to adjust all of the structures which were quickly assembled, but built to last and endure. To an extent, colonial structures were built with a form of survivance in mind. Once one group is colonized, it almost seems as though the quickest form of reconciliation or retribution is through the colonization of another group of people. Now, is this to say that I am assuming colonization can only be dismantled in a matter of years? No. It is to say that I believe that coloniality will take decades to erase, and I do not see the lifespan of humanity occupying the same lengthy lifespan.
To reiterate, my perspective is limited. I began reading with the idea that the lifespan of humanity after 2014 is waning. This limited view constricted me and did not allow me to completely agree with Mignolo's theory. Although I agree that colonialism is the the "hated little sister" which the family attempts to disguise as modernization, or progress, or development, and I partially agree that "the decolonization of knowledge and subjectivity through the imagination of alternatives to capitalism and alternatives to the modern state and its reliance on military power... is taking place" (Mignolo, 85); however, I do not believe it has garnered sufficient support to be considered ultimately successful. I also do not believe there is a way for these movements to be greatly successful until all of colonialism is disbanded.
Now this post is not in any way a means to say that I have the answer to ending colonialism. It is also not not an attempt to say that Mignolo's theory was not brilliant. Instead it is to say I do not entirely agree with his theory.
*the use of the term historical is not to confine this text to the European, Greco Abrahamic linearity of time, but merely to contextualize my thoughts through a method that is familiar.
Unfortunately, I am working from a limited perspective and I do not yet have the scope to conceive of the abolition of colonialism. Considering the ways in which the land of The People has been historically* misused, it will be difficult to adjust all of the structures which were quickly assembled, but built to last and endure. To an extent, colonial structures were built with a form of survivance in mind. Once one group is colonized, it almost seems as though the quickest form of reconciliation or retribution is through the colonization of another group of people. Now, is this to say that I am assuming colonization can only be dismantled in a matter of years? No. It is to say that I believe that coloniality will take decades to erase, and I do not see the lifespan of humanity occupying the same lengthy lifespan.
To reiterate, my perspective is limited. I began reading with the idea that the lifespan of humanity after 2014 is waning. This limited view constricted me and did not allow me to completely agree with Mignolo's theory. Although I agree that colonialism is the the "hated little sister" which the family attempts to disguise as modernization, or progress, or development, and I partially agree that "the decolonization of knowledge and subjectivity through the imagination of alternatives to capitalism and alternatives to the modern state and its reliance on military power... is taking place" (Mignolo, 85); however, I do not believe it has garnered sufficient support to be considered ultimately successful. I also do not believe there is a way for these movements to be greatly successful until all of colonialism is disbanded.
Now this post is not in any way a means to say that I have the answer to ending colonialism. It is also not not an attempt to say that Mignolo's theory was not brilliant. Instead it is to say I do not entirely agree with his theory.
*the use of the term historical is not to confine this text to the European, Greco Abrahamic linearity of time, but merely to contextualize my thoughts through a method that is familiar.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)